Showing posts with label Badman Consultation Questions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Badman Consultation Questions. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

The Timetable 2009 - 10

January 19th 2009:

The Review of Elective Home Education was announced by the DCSF with a public consultation consisting of seven questions and lasting four weeks, concluding on February 20th 2009.

There was also a 60 question questionnaire for LAs, which we believe was answered by 90 LAs, with further in-depth questions on vulnerable children which was answered by 25 LAs. Mr Badman also visited and spoke to a number of interested parties.

June 11th 2009:

Mr Badman's Review of Elective Home Education was published and the proposals for registration and monitoring were seconded in a letter from Ed Balls. Compulsory registration, monitoring and access to the home educated child in the family home as proposed in the Review would require a new Act of Parliament.

June 11th 2009:

A full public consultation entitled "Home Education - registration and monitoring proposals" was announced at the same time as the release of the Review of Elective Home Education. Everyone is invited to respond. (Closing date for responses 19th October). The government has said that their report on the consultation will not be made public until January 2010.  The DCSF response to this consultation can be viewed here.

June 29th 2009:

The Government gave notice of their intentions with the announcement in their Draft Legislative Programme of the Improving Schools and Safeguarding Children Bill which contained the clause:

"improving monitoring arrangements for children educated at home;"

July 22nd 2009:

The Children, Schools and Families Select Committee announce a short inquiry into the Badman review. They invite submissions up to noon on Tuesday 22nd September 2009.

Videos of the two sessions of the Committee on the subject of the Home Education Review are now available here and here. Transcripts available here and here.

September 2009:

We gather from Ed Balls that the government plan to make a fuller response to the Badman Review Recommendations . This response became public on 9th October 2009, and may be read here.


October 19th 2009:

Consultation on Registration and Monitoring Proposals closes. We must have our responses in before this date. Results from the consultation will not be published by the government until February 2010.

November 18th 2009:

Queen's Speech in which it is expected that the Improving Schools and Safeguarding Children Bill will be announced.

3rd December 2009:

Parliament begins work on the content of the Queen's Speech and the Government's agenda. After the five days of general debates on the Queen's Speech, the programme of work to turn what is outlined in the Queen's Speech into legislation begins as Bills are introduced in both Houses.

Once the bill has been announced, it should follow a predetermined course through the House of Commons and the House of Lords. This usually takes about two months:

"The following stages take place in both Houses:
  • First reading (formal introduction of the Bill without debate)
  • Second reading (general debate)
  • Committee stage (detailed examination, debate and amendments. In the House of Commons this stage takes place in a Public Bill Committee.)
  • Report stage (opportunity for further amendments)
  • Third reading (final chance for debate; amendments are possible in the Lords)
When a Bill has passed through both Houses it is returned to the first House (where it started) for the second House's amendments to be considered.
Both Houses must agree on the final text. There may be several rounds of exchanges between the two Houses until agreement is reached on every word of the Bill. Once this happens the Bill proceeds to the next stage: Royal Assent.
  • Royal Assent (granted by the monarch)
  • Act of Parliament (the proposals of the Bill have now become law)"
NB: If the government were to prove very eager to get the bill through, they could attempt a guillotine motion which would severely limit the time set aside for debate. However, we hear that MPs could insist on the various clauses being debated and this could possibly thwart the guillotine motion, hence allowing proper debate.

The risk of a guillotine motion is yet another reason why it is so important to speak to our MPs now. They need to understand the fallacies underpinning the Badman review, and the significance of removing parental responsibility for education so that they can insist on proper debate.

Tuesday 18th December at midnight:
Publication of Children, Schools and Families Select Committee Report into the Badman Review

January 6th 16.00 - 17.00.

There will be a meeting of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Home Education with the Schools Minister in the House of Commons. Make sure your MP is there.

January 2010.

 Public announcement of the goverment's report on the consultation "Home Education - Registration and Monitoring Proposals.

January 11th:
Second Reading of the Children, Schools and Families Bill.

19th January:
17.15 to 19.00 hours. The hearing for the Public Bill Committee .

February 4th:
The date by which the government aims to have completed the Public Bill Committee stage for the Children, Schools and Families Bill

February 23rd:
Report Stage of Children, Schools and Families Bill - when Bill is again debated in the House of Commons.

February 23rd:
Third Reading of the Children, Schools and Families Bill, following which the bill will go forward to the Lords.

February 24th:
First Reading of CSF Bill in the Lords

March 2nd:Home education meeting for the Lords, 6-7pm, Committee Room 16, House of Commons. Hosted by the All Party Parliamentary Group. The room will be available until 7.30pm.

March 8th:

Second Reading of CSF Bill in the Lords

Early Summer 2010:

General Election, latest possible date for which = 3rd June 2010. Probable date: 6th May. Same date as the local elections. See argument here.
Posted by at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Consultation on Home Education - Registering and Monitoring Proposals.

Home Education - Registration and Monitoring Proposals


Launch Date: Thursday 11 June 2009
Closing Date: Monday 19 October 2009

Following the review of home education, the Government is proposing to introduce arrangements for the registration and monitoring of home educated children. The consultation document sets out our proposals for a registration scheme and arrangements for the monitoring of provision to ensure that children are receiving the education they are entitled to. There is also a proposal that where there are serious concerns about the ability of the parent to provide their child with a suitable education in a safe environment then they should not be permitted to educate their child at home. The consultation seeks the views of home educating families, groups representing home educating families, local authorities, other agencies involved in the provision of services for children, and the public, on our proposals.

Consultation document

1. Background and Context

1.1

The Review of Home Education in England published on 11 June (click here) took evidence from a large number of home educators, many local authorities and other groups who work with home educating families. The terms of reference recognised that parents have a well established right to educate their children at home and that the government respects that right, and has no plans to change that position. They also set out the Department's commitment to ensuring that systems for keeping children safe and receiving a suitable education, are as robust as possible. They recognised that where local authorities have concerns about the safety and welfare, or education, of a home educated child, effective systems must be in place to deal with those concerns.

1.2

The review's recommendations set out specific proposals for improving the capacity of local authorities and other public services to support home educators. The government, in its initial response (click here), is considering carefully the best way to implement them: a significant amount of further development work will be needed with local authorities, home educators and other organisations. We will publish a full response to the review's recommendations by the end of September.

1.3

The review found no evidence that home education was used to cover forced marriage, servitude, or trafficking other than in isolated cases. However, the reviewer was provided with evidence showing that the number of home educated children known to Children's Social Services in some LAs was disproportionately high relative to the size of their home educating population. There are well established procedures for supporting children known to a local authority where there are safeguarding concerns. However, the review notes that without knowledge of, or access to, a child, such powers are meaningless. HMCI, in her response to the call for evidence, noted that ‘schools have an important responsibility to monitor children's safety and welfare but this safety net is missing for children educated at home.'

1.4

For these reasons the government has decided to take immediate steps to reduce the risk that home education can be used as a cover for child abuse or neglect. The response to the review records our commitment to tighten up safeguarding procedures by:
  • Establishing a register of home educated children in each local authority;
  • Giving local authorities discretion to prohibit children from being home educated in circumstances where there are safeguarding concerns;
  • Introducing tougher monitoring arrangements which will require local authorities to interview home educated children and visit the premises where home education is taking place to ensure that a suitable and efficient education is being provided and the children are safe and well.

2. The Proposals

2.1 Register of home educated children

The review recommends that DCSF establishes a national registration scheme, locally administered, for all children of statutory school age who are, or become, electively home educated. The scheme described in the review is one where education and safeguarding issues are both considered as part of the registration process, with an initial statement of educational intent forming the basis for subsequent educational monitoring arrangements. The review response acknowledges that ultimately the scheme would need to be underpinned by guidance and training for local authority staff in order to work effectively. We accept that it will take time to put the full scheme in place particularly where more work is needed to provide more comprehensive guidance on the practical interpretation of ‘efficient' and ‘suitable'.

2.2

Registration would be granted automatically unless there were safeguarding concerns (see next section): if at any time a LA became dissatisfied with the quality of home education provided to a child, it would - as now - serve a school attendance order.

2.3

We propose to legislate now for registration and monitoring arrangements that will focus on safeguarding but should also improve the quality of education. They will have the following features:
  • Every home educated child of compulsory school age must be registered with the local authority in which the child is resident;
  • Regulations will specify the information that parents must provide which is likely to be child's name, date of birth, address, the same information for adults with parental responsibility; a statement of approach to education, and the location where education is conducted if not the home;
  • Scope to extend the scheme to 18 in future;
  • Regulations will specify how registration should take place;
  • Any changes to registration details should be notified immediately;
  • Registration must be renewed annually;
  • It will be a criminal offence to fail to register or to provide inadequate or false information;
  • Pupils should stay on the school roll for 20 days after a notification to home educate;
  • The school must provide the local authority with a record of achievement to date and predicted future attainment;
  • DCSF will take powers to issue statutory guidance relating to registration and monitoring.

    Consultation Questions: 
Question 1.
Do you agree that these proposals strike the right balance between the rights of parents to home educate and the rights of children to receive a suitable education?
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •  

Comments:



====================

Question 2
Do you agree that a register should be kept?

  •   
  •   
  •   
  •  

Comments:



=========================

Question 3. Do you agree with the information to be provided for registration?

  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   





========================

Question 4.
Do you agree that home educating parents should be required to keep the register up to date?

  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   

Comments:



====================

Question 5.
Do you agree that it should be a criminal offence to fail to register or to provide inadequate or false information?
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   



Comments:



=======================

Question 6a.
Do you agree that home educated children should stay on the roll of their former school for 20 days after parents notify that they intend to home educate?
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   


Comments:


====================

Question 6b.
Do you agree that the school should provide the local authority with achievement and future attainment data?




Comments:



  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
=========================

Question 7.
Do you agree that DCSF should take powers to issue statutory guidance in relation to the registration and monitoring of home education?

  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   

Comments:






=====================

2.4 Safeguarding

The review recommends that local authorities should have a discretion to refuse registration where there are safeguarding concerns. In addition, if safeguarding concerns are identified after home education has begun, the LA would have powers to revoke registration. Each case would need to be considered on its merits, balancing the rights of parents to home educate, and the rights of children to receive a suitable education in a safe environment.

=================

Question 8.
Do you agree that children about whom there are substantial safeguarding concerns should not be home educated?

  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   

Comments:




=====================

2.5 Monitoring arrangements

Local authorities tell us that they need greater powers to ensure that home educated children are safe, well, and receiving a suitable education. The current arrangements allow parents to submit evidence that a ‘suitable education' is being provided, which could be mainly written evidence. Local authorities have no powers to interview home educated children to establish that sample material provided is representative of their work, nor to establish that they are safe and well.

2.6

We believe that local authorities should interview children within 4 weeks of home education starting, after 6 months has elapsed, and thereafter at least annually to assess the quality of education provided and ensure that children are safe and well. The local authority should visit the premises where education is conducted, and question the child about the education provided, although at least 2 weeks notice should be given before the visit is conducted. The local authority should have the right to carry out the interview without a parent being present, if this is judged appropriate, or alternatively if the child is vulnerable or has particular communication needs, in the company of a trusted person who is not the home educator or parent/carer.

===================

Question 9.
Do you agree that the local authority should visit the premises where home education is taking place provided 2 weeks notice is given?

  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   


Comments:


=======================


Question 10.
Do you agree that the local authority should have the power to interview the child, alone if this is judged appropriate, or if not in the presence of a trusted person who is not the parent/carer?


  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   

Comments:



====================

Question 11.
Do you agree that the local authority should visit the premises and interview the child within four weeks of home education starting, after 6 months has elapsed, at the anniversary of home education starting, and thereafter at least on an annual basis? This would not preclude more frequent monitoring if the local authority thought that was necessary.

  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   

Comments:


=====================

Consultation responses can be completed online at www.dcsf.gov.uk/consultations
or by emailing homeeducation.consultation@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk or by downloading a response form which should be completed and sent to:

Consultation Unit, Area GB,
Castle View House,
East Lane, Runcorn,
Cheshire, WA7 2GJ.

5. Plans for making results public

5.1 The results of the consultation and the Department's response will be published on the DCSF e-consultation website in early 2010. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)