Sunday, October 10, 2010
Friday, October 08, 2010
Proposed new guidance?
Everyone PLEASE NOTE: Gill has the answer to the conflicts that current education law presents.
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Friday, September 24, 2010
Home Education and Aspergers
A totally credible article about the misery experienced by some children at school and the salvation that can be achieved through home education.
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Wednesday, September 08, 2010
Sunday, September 05, 2010
Saturday, September 04, 2010
Friday, September 03, 2010
Oxford Home Schooling on Waterloo Road
Suffice it to say that this is a fairly measured response to the caricatural and actually totally inaccurate portrayal of home education in this country, most comments being along the lines of "What utter drivel".
Wednesday, September 01, 2010
Lord Soley from Lords of the Blog
...is at it again. Home educators provide cogent replies in comments, having actually read the Serious Case Review, and the judges summaries - unlike many others.
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Emma Thompson Home Educates
...at least for a year. Yay, but honestly, you'd have thought she was committing some terrible crime, the way the authorities have reacted.
And no, you don't have to convince the authorities that you will provide a suitable education when you deregister. You just have to hand in a letter.
Here's the deal: in law, parents are responsible for ensuring that their children receive a suitable education. The state only has to step in after the event, if it a suitable education isn't happening.
UPDATE: here's Kelly on the story.
And no, you don't have to convince the authorities that you will provide a suitable education when you deregister. You just have to hand in a letter.
Here's the deal: in law, parents are responsible for ensuring that their children receive a suitable education. The state only has to step in after the event, if it a suitable education isn't happening.
UPDATE: here's Kelly on the story.
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Old news for many HEors
...but now it's official: children should sleep with their parents till they're five.
Saturday, August 21, 2010
Why autonomous education works
Oh goodness me. I promised not to rise to this, but autonomous education is being so appallingly traduced in another arena, that it seemed irresponsible not to, and I have firmly promised myself that I will maintain some basic standards and ground-rules in the process.
It has been said (by a consistent and to date, impervious critic of autonomous education) that there is little evidence that it works. In fact, in comments, this critic goes further. He claims there is active evidence that it positively doesn't work and supports this claim by citing the article:
'Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching'
Having considerably less time than I used to have, I haven't read anything other than the synopsis of this article, but this alone is sufficient to ascertain that it is not a criticism of autonomous education. It is instead, a criticism of the neglectful form of education which, well, let's face it, does seem likely to fail.
However, autonomous education and neglect are not one and the same thing. Indeed autonomous educators frequently spend quite a lot of their time offering guidance. Guidance, in the form of the offer of tentatively held theories, is not precluded by the practice of autonomous education. What is precluded is coercion.
Coercion is defined by many UK HEors (and others who are concerned with the subject) as "being forced to enact a theory that is not active in the mind". Conversely, this simply means that autonomous education is learning with the theory active in the mind. This is the defining essence of autonomous education and means that it can happen in highly structured situations, where the individual is being taught in entirely pedagogical fashion, or when the learner is getting on with what he is doing entirely by himself.
Given this oft-repeated error about AE, (ie: the one about confusing AE with neglect), it is worth spelling it out all over again: an autonomous educator would be failing in their task if they were to fail to offer theories when a child wanted them.
As to the evidence that AE works? One group we used to attend was largely made up of much older autonomously educated children. I saw a lot of them again last week. Aside from the three who have gone to or are going to Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial, all the others are now either in some other university/college or work and all are happily doing what they want to do.
I personally don't feel the need to trawl for irrelevant scholarly articles on the internet to be certain that that autonomous education actually works.
It has been said (by a consistent and to date, impervious critic of autonomous education) that there is little evidence that it works. In fact, in comments, this critic goes further. He claims there is active evidence that it positively doesn't work and supports this claim by citing the article:
'Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching'
Having considerably less time than I used to have, I haven't read anything other than the synopsis of this article, but this alone is sufficient to ascertain that it is not a criticism of autonomous education. It is instead, a criticism of the neglectful form of education which, well, let's face it, does seem likely to fail.
However, autonomous education and neglect are not one and the same thing. Indeed autonomous educators frequently spend quite a lot of their time offering guidance. Guidance, in the form of the offer of tentatively held theories, is not precluded by the practice of autonomous education. What is precluded is coercion.
Coercion is defined by many UK HEors (and others who are concerned with the subject) as "being forced to enact a theory that is not active in the mind". Conversely, this simply means that autonomous education is learning with the theory active in the mind. This is the defining essence of autonomous education and means that it can happen in highly structured situations, where the individual is being taught in entirely pedagogical fashion, or when the learner is getting on with what he is doing entirely by himself.
Given this oft-repeated error about AE, (ie: the one about confusing AE with neglect), it is worth spelling it out all over again: an autonomous educator would be failing in their task if they were to fail to offer theories when a child wanted them.
As to the evidence that AE works? One group we used to attend was largely made up of much older autonomously educated children. I saw a lot of them again last week. Aside from the three who have gone to or are going to Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial, all the others are now either in some other university/college or work and all are happily doing what they want to do.
I personally don't feel the need to trawl for irrelevant scholarly articles on the internet to be certain that that autonomous education actually works.
Saturday, August 07, 2010
Wednesday, August 04, 2010
The "national scandal" of Children's Social Work
...and news of the progress of the Munro report in CYPNow.
Sunday, August 01, 2010
A Quick Mention
David Friedman on "Anarchy and Efficient Law" touches upon the subject of HEing in California right at the beginning of this talk.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)